The Breastfeeding Doll: Yay or Nay?
The buzz online lately is all about the new breastfeeding doll. Named “Baby Glutton” (or, as its Spanish maker calls it, “Bebe Gloton”), the toy makes sucking sounds as it “nurses” from its young adopted mother. She (or he!) wears a halter top adorned with two “daises” that substitute for nipples. Electronic sensors in the doll and halter tell the crying doll when it’s full or needs more.
Opinions on this doll, which is currently only available in Spain, vary wildly. While many think the doll is a great way to promote breastfeeding with future mothers, just as many are horrified. Some have even suggested that the doll can lead to precocious sexual behavior.
My personal opinion is that first of all, we’re not giving children enough credit. Most children know what breastfeeding is. Emulating a safe and normal mothering activity that they have previously been exposed to is not going to confuse children and make them want to experiment sexually. Ask any child, and they will tell you what a mother’s breasts are used for. Most children have seen animals in the act of nursing as well. It’s all natural to kids, why do we adults always have to turn it into something weird?
If this breastfeeding doll is so offensive and so sexually suggestive, then how do you explain the popularity of Bratz dolls and other “fashion” dolls?
So, this is offensive?

But, this is not?

Personally, I’d prefer it if my daughter pretended her breasts were for nurturing her doll instead of getting good tips at the dolly “gentlemen’s club”.
This is all much ado over nothing! If anything, all of the online discussion over this doll has been the best advertising this doll’s maker could have ever hoped for!
What do you think?
Images: nydailynews, lawyerahead






















